When OWL met DL-Lite

نویسندگان

  • Claudio Corona
  • Emma Di Pasquale
  • Antonella Poggi
  • Marco Ruzzi
  • Domenico Fabio Savo
چکیده

Recent research in the area of ontology representation for the Semantic Web has led to several different language proposals. Among the others, it led to the standardization of OWL, on one hand, and to the emergence of the DL-Lite family of Description Logics, on the other hand. These two outcomes mainly differ on their objective: while OWL aims to be a standard, and as such, it is tailored towards expressivity, the main goal of the languages in the DL-Lite family is to allow accessing huge amount of data, by maintaining tractability, and delegating query processing to a DBMS. In this paper we show how DL-Lite can meet OWL. Specifically, we focus on DL-LiteA, the language in the DL-Lite family that is closest to OWL, and introduce the SparSQL language, a concrete epistemic query language, inspired by both SQL and SPARQL, that allows posing expressive tractable queries over DL-LiteA ontologies. Finally, we introduce the main novel DL-LiteA features beyond OWL. The capability of handling such features, together with the SparSQL queries, are some of the new functionalities recently implemented in the MASTRO system.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

WSML Deliverable D 20 . 1 v 0 . 2 OWL −

This deliverable presents restricted variants of the OWL Lite, DL and Full species of the OWL ontology language, called OWL Lite−, OWL DL− and OWL Full−, respectively. OWL Lite− and OWL DL− are strict subsets of OWL Lite and OWL DL. They are limited in such a way that there exists a translation from both languages directly into the deductive database language Datalog. Thus, any OWL Lite− or OWL...

متن کامل

When DL-Lite met OWL

DL-Lite is a family of Description Logics (DLs) whose aim is to capture some of the most popular conceptual modeling formalisms, such as Entity-Relationship model [4] and UML class diagrams1, while preserving the tractability of the most important reasoning tasks, such as ontology satisfiability and query answering of arbitrary (union of) conjunctive queries (ground and not ground). More specif...

متن کامل

WSML Deliverable D 20 . 1 v 0 . 2 OWL − WSML Working Draft – January 6 , 2005

This deliverable presents restricted variants of the OWL Lite, DL and Full species of the OWL ontology language, called OWL Lite−, OWL DL− and OWL Full−, respectively. OWL Lite− and OWL DL− are strict subsets of OWL Lite and OWL DL. They are limited in such a way that there exists a translation from both languages directly into dunction-free logic programs, i.e., Datalog. Thus, any OWL Lite− or...

متن کامل

OWL DL: Trees or Triples?

The Web Ontology Language (OWL) defines three classes of documents: Lite, DL and Full. All RDF/XML documents are OWL Full documents, some OWL Full documents are also OWL DL documents, and some OWL DL documents are also OWL Lite documents. This paper discusses parsing and species recognition – that is the process of determining whether a given document falls into the OWL Lite, DL or Full class. ...

متن کامل

DL-Lite without UNA

Description logics (DLs) have recently been used to provide access to large amounts of data through a high-level conceptual interface, which is of relevance to both data integration and ontology-based data access. The fundamental inference service in this case is answering queries by taking into account the axioms in the TBox and the data stored in the ABox. The key property for such an approac...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008